Tag: androgynous

Androgynous/Feminine Trans Guys

Published on by rainbowamoryLeave a comment

image<—->image

Hi guys. So without turning this into a blog about my transition or something, I feel I should share some of the insights I’ve gained over these past few weeks, just about gender identity and gender expression, since this stuff is still on topic.

If you identify as FTM then you’d be familiar with one or more of the online trans communities out there, including the one on YouTube. You might also be familiar then with some of the divisions and conflicts that exist within the community itself.

Having kind of stepped into this community and looked around a little, I’ve noticed that one of the major points of disagreement among trans people appears to revolve around gender expression, and the various forms of masculinity and femininity that can shine through it.

In particular, there seems to be a lot of negative energy and criticism directed at transgender people that don’t present as stereotypical Male or Female. What I’ve seen is mainly from the FTM side, so I want to comment on that, but I think these same issues seem to exist for certain MTFs as well.

When I say not stereotypical, I’m referring to those FTMs who present themselves in a more feminine way than most (the androgynous or femme FTMs). Some of these guys have had to deal with people telling them that they are not masculine enough to be trans, or that they should simply ‘stay a girl’, or that they should give up their preferred style of dress or cut their hair a certain way in order to ‘pass’ – as if that’s the only goal anyone should ever have when they decide to transition.

I feel like I’ve just gotten an harsh reality check about what I’m going to face in the next few years of my own life… because my ideal gender presentation is the androgynous male look – like Lelouch Lamperouge from the anime Code Geass (That character is the embodiment of my personal masculine ideal). My favourite trans guy on YouTube is this guy (https://www.youtube.com/user/beckdrop/videos). Why? Cause he looks like Lelouch. O.o

Ok, back to the topic. I feel like people need to take a step back and remind themselves what trans identity really is. You don’t just become trans the moment you take your first hormone shot. And if you stop taking hormones, you don’t stop being trans either (unless you genuinely made a mistake and had never truly identified as transgender to begin with). Trans identity is not defined by these visible, tangible, physical details. It is something all trans-identified people experience inside themselves before they come out. Some trans people never come out, never transition, but still carry around the conflicting emotions and thoughts that are associated with gender dysphoria, in varying levels, throughout their lives. Any one of these paths are valid, and taking any one of them doesn’t make you more or less TRANS, since your gender identity is something that has always been and will always be on the inside, whether or not it ever shows on the outside, regardless of other people acknowledging it.

image

Those FTMs that transition and retain some feminine characteristics or habits or ways of self-expression are no less male than those who want to get as far away from femininity as possible in their outward presentation. Why is there a need to have some kind of overblown power struggle over who gets to claim that label and who doesn’t?

Firstly, look around at the world a little – when you’re on the bus, or travelling on vacation. There are plenty of cis men who act super feminine in the way they dress or the way they interact with others. Does that make them less ‘male’? And the cis women in this world that are extremely masculine… are they less ‘female’ identified? If you were to say yes, then you might as well say there is no difference between a butch woman and a pre-T, masculine transguy.

But there is. And where is the difference? It’s in the gender dysphoria that is experienced in an internal way. A butch lesbian is generally ok with her assigned gender. That’s why butch lesbians even exist. Otherwise they’d all claim to be FTM or seek transition.

What makes a trans guy different is that he’s NOT ok with his assigned gender, and he identifies as male on the inside, whether there’s testosterone coursing through his veins or not. But when we transition and begin to be seen as male, we have more freedom to play around with our gender expression. Isn’t the whole idea of transition about finding happiness/self-acceptance?

Cis guys can do whatever they want without being questioned… they may get made fun of, but no one will doubt they are Male. Because they’ve got the body, all the standard male parts. As trans people, if we make any part of physical appearance a requirement for claiming our Male identity we invalidate trans identity yet again, because we’re saying that it’s what’s on the outside that makes one a man.

You can’t just validate some trans guys and invalidate others. The only way to be consistent about what it means to be trans is to place the emphasis on our internal experience of gender, regardless of what that translates to on the outside.

If you emphasise the physical, the visible, then the cis system wins… because you let them apply their rules to you, blending in among them while ignoring the existence of non-binaries and alternative gender expressions. Maybe you’re happy that way, but what about those that don’t fit in? If you’re going to say they are less male for not acting or looking a certain way, then you might as well give up your own struggle, since by society’s narrow standards none of us would ever be seen for who we really are on the inside as long as we go on trying to say that it’s physical characteristics and mannerisms alone that makes a man or woman.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with living stealth. Transphobia is incredibly hard to bear, especially when combined with your own internal gender dysphoria. It makes sense that some people don’t even want that label ‘trans’ attached to them, and do not feel they belong in the gay community at all. That’s fine, as long as you’re not spreading ignorance and homophobia.

But if it bothers you so much that feminine/androgynous trans guys exist, then just stay away from them. It’s that simple. Their existence doesn’t invalidate your existence. When you criticize non-binaries and/or alternative gender presentations, all you’re doing is hurting your own cause, and hurting others who are very much like you at the core. Gender dysphoria is the common thread that connects us, not which surgeries we get or whether or not we ever decide to go on hormones or how well we fit into the cis binary at any one point in our lives.

If you don’t deny a feminine cis guy his male identity, then you should be able to respect a feminine trans guy’s male identity, even if you may not fully understand it. In an ideal world, we’d all just be able to choose which body we inhabit, but for now the least we could do is try to see each other’s souls.

image<–Lelouch.

Pic From: http://xxajisai-graphicxx.deviantart.com/art/Render-Lelouch-322476909

What Type of Lesbian Are You? (Does it Matter?)

Published on by rainbowamoryLeave a comment

image

(Image from: LGBT Presentation by Janea Hubbard)

If you’ve been out in the gay community, you may have encountered some of these labels by now: Femme, Lipstick Lesbian – Butch, Stone Butch, Stud – and the many in-betweens (Chapstick, Boi, Soft Butch, Androgynous, Switch, Stem, Futch). It might be necessary to leave some blanks in case any more varieties spring up in the future of the lesbian crop: ______, ______, ______ …

What type of lesbian are you? Have you ever thought about it? Do you fit into any of the above mentioned categories, or are you a potential filler for one of the blanks? And most importantly,

Does it matter?

Life being a journey, it can take years and many experiences to develop an full understanding of one’s self. A person can be old and still discovering things about themselves – things they might’ve denied in their youth, or completely new facets of identity that only happened to appear in that specific time in their lives.

Some hold the attitude that there’s no rush to define yourself in any fixed way. And that can be very liberating, if in the meantime you are not misleading someone else or letting once-in-a-lifetime opportunities slip past you.

But there can also be a strong pressure from within the community to define yourself, as a preliminary requirement for becoming a recognized member of that community.

In either option there is something to lose. If you rush to define your identity according to strictly defined categories, you risk submerging your real self in order to get stuck playing yet another socially constructed ‘role’, as if it wasn’t hard enough to escape or redefine your originally assigned (straight, cis) role in the coming out process. Yet if you don’t attempt to label yourself even loosely, you might involuntarily be making it difficult for potential partners to seek you out.

Dating is difficult enough in a minority. Divisions according to ‘types’ can only make it moreso. So what do you do if you are unsure? Or if you feel you honestly don’t belong to any of the ready-made categories. Do you put on the label that comes closest to reflecting who you are and hope for the best? Or do you insist on living without a label, knowing that you may be overlooked by those on the lookout for very specific signs in their search for a partner?

Is there a solution? Maybe not an easy one, but it seems the best option would be the one with the least amount of consequences attached to it.

As long as you’re honest with your partner, there should be nothing wrong with taking your time in figuring out your ‘type’. And if nothing suits you perfectly, why not just be yourself? If there are others like you, a whole new category may form around you and them and you wouldn’t have to feel so alone. Just because there are already fixed labels out there, doesn’t mean the Label Maker is out of service. You can always carve out a niche for yourself where you and others like you don’t have to try too hard to belong.

And if you can’t find ‘others like you’ willing to take on a new label together, the best thing to do might be to remind yourself that each person is desirable to someone. No single ‘type’ can seduce the entire community. As long as what you seek is someone (monogamous) or a some people (polyamorous) to like you for you then it may be more beneficial and less painful in the long-term to go without a label.

Because if you do put on a label without feeling fully sure, and you begin to date, you and your partner may or may not be on the same page. This is where life would get complicated. If you tell them you’re one thing and they expect you to stay that way, you could get stuck playing a part again, and find yourself in a place where experimenting with your gender expression can leave the other person feeling disappointed or uncomfortable. e.g. if you say to someone that you’re a soft butch and a few months or years into the relationship you tell them you are actually trans and want to transition, some lesbians and bi girls can be ok with it, others won’t.

There’s nothing you could do if you just realized it with time. However, sometimes a good indication that things may change is that you feel unsure about taking on a label in the start – or not fully comfortable with the labels others place on you. If this is the case, it’s best not to take on a label at all, or at least to delay until you’re sure. This way you leave yourself space to grow, and anyone you date is more likely to accept that your gender expression is not a fixed one – or that you may be one of the blanks in the making.

Yea, this approach might take more patience, be a little more of a lonely road to take. But in the long run, it might be the least risky and the least likely to leave you heartbroken.

Everyone is desirable to someone. By denying your true self and comfort to accommodate someone else’s tastes, you might be making yourself less visible to those that would find you attractive exactly for who you are.

For your amusement, have a look at this page to see the different types of lesbians people have identified over the years. A glance at the comments should show that although there seems to be such an big emphasis placed on taking on a label in the LGBTQ community, many lesbians in real life are unsure of which one describes them best, or feel that more than one label applies to them.

Another option is that you can always take an existing label with its accompanying definitions and add your own dimensions to it. (e.g. be a long-haired Butch instead of a short haired one) Just like not all girls are straight, and not all gay girls look the same, not all categories will contain people that act the exact same way or agree to a single definition of what it means to be Butch or Femme or anything in between. To see this all you’d have to do is pick out a bunch of people from a single ‘type’ and compare them to each other – individual for individual. Are they all the same to you?